
doi: 10.1068/p5933
pmid: 19227372
When a movie presents a person walking, the background appears to move in the direction opposite to the person's gait. This study verified this backscroll illusion by presenting a point-light walker against a background of a random-dot cinematogram (RDC). The RDC consisted of some signal dots moving coherently either leftward or rightward among other noise dots moving randomly. The method of constant stimuli was used to vary the RDC in motion coherence from trial to trial by manipulating the direction and percentage of the signal dots. Six observers judged the perceived direction of coherent motion in a two-alternative forced-choice procedure. Response rates for coherent motion perception in the direction opposite to walking were evaluated as a function of motion coherence. The results showed that the psychometric function shifted toward the direction determined by a bias in the opposite direction to the walker. The mean threshold was about half as high as that in a control condition in which the positions of the point-lights were scrambled to impair the recognition of the walker. The results demonstrate that biological motion noticeably affects the appearance of motion coherence in the background.
Adult, Male, Psychometrics, Optical Illusions, Motion Perception, Walking, Young Adult, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Psychophysics, Humans, Female, Photic Stimulation
Adult, Male, Psychometrics, Optical Illusions, Motion Perception, Walking, Young Adult, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Psychophysics, Humans, Female, Photic Stimulation
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 9 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
