
doi: 10.1068/p5736
pmid: 18773726
Reducing the level of internal noise is seen as a goal when designing modern cars. One danger of such a philosophy is that one is systematically attempting to alter one of the cues that can be used by drivers to estimate speed and this could bias speed judgments and driving behaviour. Seven participants were presented with pairs of video-based driving scenes and asked to judge whether the second scene appeared faster or slower than the first (2-alternative forced-choice task using the method of constant stimuli). They either heard in-car noise at the level it occurred in the real world or reduced in volume by 5 dB. The reduction in noise led to participants judging speeds to be significantly slower and this effect was evident for all participants. This finding indicates that, when in-car noise is attenuated, drivers are likely to underestimate their speed, potentially encouraging them to drive faster and placing them at greater risk of crashing.
INVOLVEMENT, Adult, Male, Automobile Driving, INFORMATION, Psychometrics, Motion Perception, 1702 Artificial Intelligence, 2809 Sensory Systems, Vision, Monocular, DRIVERS, Psychophysics, Reaction Time, Humans, RISK-TAKING BEHAVIOR, 3205 Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 380, VELOCITY, PSYCHOMETRIC FUNCTION, Auditory Perception, VEHICLE CHARACTERISTICS, Female, AUTOMOBILE, INTEGRATION
INVOLVEMENT, Adult, Male, Automobile Driving, INFORMATION, Psychometrics, Motion Perception, 1702 Artificial Intelligence, 2809 Sensory Systems, Vision, Monocular, DRIVERS, Psychophysics, Reaction Time, Humans, RISK-TAKING BEHAVIOR, 3205 Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 380, VELOCITY, PSYCHOMETRIC FUNCTION, Auditory Perception, VEHICLE CHARACTERISTICS, Female, AUTOMOBILE, INTEGRATION
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 32 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
