
doi: 10.1068/p2664 , 10.1068/p280935
pmid: 10664746
The whole literature on the so-called dimensional effects of amodal completion (shrinkage of a partially occluded figure and expansion of modally visible parts of the same figure) is critically reviewed. It is claimed that phenomenal shrinkage is the sum of at least two illusions independent of figure – ground distinction: (1) shrinkage of spaces divided into a few parts, and (2) shrinkage of empty spaces. It is also shown that a partially occluded figure can widen, rather than shrink. It is concluded that the stratification in two phenomenally superimposed figures accompanies the shrinkage effect, but is irrelevant to its generation. Further experiments are needed in order to draw a well-grounded conclusion on the expansion effect.
Pattern Recognition, Visual, Optical Illusions, Psychology, Experimental, Perceptual Closure, Humans
Pattern Recognition, Visual, Optical Illusions, Psychology, Experimental, Perceptual Closure, Humans
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 20 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
