
doi: 10.1068/p110075
pmid: 6752865
Relations among percepts in the organized perceptual world are called percept—percept couplings. If these couplings are assigned a causal interpretation they present a challenge to a theory of direct perception. Experimental evidence of percept-percept coupling is reviewed and the case for a causal interpretation of these relations is examined. It is concluded that the causal interpretation is plausible and that the facts of percept—percept couplings need to be addressed by advocates of a theory of direct perception.
Depth Perception, Time Factors, Distance Perception, Motion Perception, Space Perception, Visual Perception, Humans, Psychological Theory, Perceptual Masking, Lighting, Size Perception
Depth Perception, Time Factors, Distance Perception, Motion Perception, Space Perception, Visual Perception, Humans, Psychological Theory, Perceptual Masking, Lighting, Size Perception
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 72 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
