Multicriteria Evaluation: Measures, Manipulation, and Meaning—A Reply

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 01 Mar 1988 Netherlands English Publisher:SAGE PublicationsJournal:Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, volume 15, pages 65-72 (issn: 0265-8135, eissn: 1472-3417,

Copyright policy )

Authors: H Voogd;

doi: 10.1068/b150065

handle: 11370/45dafda0-7e8f-47da-b60d-7a3062f21e2c

Multicriteria Evaluation: Measures, Manipulation, and Meaning—A Reply

- Summary
- Metrics

Abstract

In this paper a reply is given to the comments and criticisms raised by Buckley in his article on the meaning of multicriteria evaluation. Several issues are discussed, among them the weighting of criterion scores, the use of ordinal measures, and the relation between multicriteria evaluation and cost-benefit evaluation. Some attention is paid to the use of natural measures.

Country

Netherlands

Related Organizations

University of Groningen
Netherlands

Impact byBIP!

	selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	12
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Top 10%
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Top 10%
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Average