
doi: 10.1068/b150055
Multicriteria evaluation is discussed in this paper. The importance to such methods of establishing weights is stressed and it is argued that the ‘weighting problem’ is their Achilles heel. Moreover, this problem is not escaped by adopting a ‘conditional approach’ to the results of such methods. It is argued that judgment underlies all evaluation approaches and that judgment can only be rationally exercised if the information presented conveys meaning. Much multicriteria evaluation discussion focuses incorrectly on mere numerical manipulation. The focus of attention should instead be the production of measures which convey meaning to those who must exercise judgment.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 15 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
