
pmid: 11877697
We graded the severity of occlusive disease in foot vessels of patients with diabetes and correlated the scoring obtained with graft patency and limb salvage.In this retrospective review of 199 limbs studied by means of angiography in 117 patients with diabetes mellitus, 124 limbs underwent bypass grafting. Each dorsalis pedis (DP), lateral plantar (LP), and medial plantar (MP) artery was assigned a score according to the reporting standards of the Joint Vascular Societies Council (0, no stenosis > 20%; 1, 21%-49% stenosis; 2, 50%-99% stenosis; 2.5, half the vessel length occluded.) A foot score (DP + MP + LP + 1) was calculated for each foot (1 to 10). The mean follow-up period was 14 months.For all 199 limbs and for the 124 limbs that underwent bypass grafting, the mean scores were similar for the DP, MP, and LP (1.8 +/- 1.0, 1.9 +/- 1.0, 1.9 +/- 1.0, respectively; P >.4). Only the MP and LP correlated with each other (r = 0.57; P or= 7) does not allow its use in identifying the subgroup of patients who are unlikely to benefit from bypass grafting surgery. It cannot be used as a means of selecting patients for primary amputation.
Arterial Occlusive Diseases, Extremities, Limb Salvage, Severity of Illness Index, Texas, Diabetic Foot, Radiography, Tibial Arteries, Treatment Outcome, Predictive Value of Tests, Recurrence, Humans, Surgery, Popliteal Artery, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Polytetrafluoroethylene, Vascular Patency, Follow-Up Studies, Retrospective Studies
Arterial Occlusive Diseases, Extremities, Limb Salvage, Severity of Illness Index, Texas, Diabetic Foot, Radiography, Tibial Arteries, Treatment Outcome, Predictive Value of Tests, Recurrence, Humans, Surgery, Popliteal Artery, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Polytetrafluoroethylene, Vascular Patency, Follow-Up Studies, Retrospective Studies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 57 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
