
doi: 10.1067/moe.2003.145
pmid: 12686923
We sought to assess the efficacy of sialoendoscopic mechanical retrieval techniques for the treatment of obstructive salivary gland disease. This study documents the authors' long-term experience with mechanical retrieval techniques, the long-term results of the procedures, the technical issues, the techniques that have been used, and the advantages and limitations of these modalities.Mechanical endoscopic techniques were used in a large referral center from 1993 to 2001 to treat 217 salivary glands for salivary gland sialolithiasis.We found that 189 of the 217 glands with salivary gland sialolithiasis became completely symptom- and stone-free, both endoscopically and by radiographs (overall success rate, 87%). In the submandibular gland group specifically, the success rate was higher, 89%. In the parotid group, it was 83%. Follow-up was continued for 40 months after treatment. No severe complications were noted. The endoscope used was the third-generation Sialoendoscope.The endoscopic mechanical retrieval of sialoliths is both safe and efficacious. This is an excellent method for the complete and certain removal of sialoliths, with minimal damage to the surrounding tissue.
Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Endoscopes, Male, Salivary Gland Calculi, Adolescent, Endoscopy, Equipment Design, Middle Aged, Catheterization, Sublingual Gland, Child, Preschool, Salivary Duct Calculi, Submandibular Gland Diseases, Humans, Female, Parotid Diseases, Child, Aged, Follow-Up Studies
Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Endoscopes, Male, Salivary Gland Calculi, Adolescent, Endoscopy, Equipment Design, Middle Aged, Catheterization, Sublingual Gland, Child, Preschool, Salivary Duct Calculi, Submandibular Gland Diseases, Humans, Female, Parotid Diseases, Child, Aged, Follow-Up Studies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 113 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
