Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao American Journal of ...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Article . 2002 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Efficacy of high condylectomy for management of condylar hyperplasia

Authors: Larry M, Wolford; Pushkar, Mehra; Oscar, Reiche-Fischel; Carlos A, Morales-Ryan; Patricia, García-Morales;

Efficacy of high condylectomy for management of condylar hyperplasia

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the treatment outcome and long-term stability of 2 groups of young adult patients diagnosed with active condylar hyperplasia and treated with 2 different surgical methods. Thirty-seven patients (19 females and 18 males) met the criteria for inclusion in the study. Group 1 (n = 12; average age at surgery, 17.5 years) was treated with orthognathic surgery only, while group 2 (n = 25; average age at surgery, 16.7 years) had high condylectomy, articular disc repositioning, and orthognathic surgery. All patients underwent standardized clinical and radiographic examination at initial consultation, immediately before surgery, immediately after surgery, and at longest follow-up. Objective evaluation of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) function included maximum incisal opening and lateral excursions. Subjective evaluations were performed in group 2 for TMJ pain, jaw function, and diet. Lateral cephalometric radiographs were evaluated for presurgical and postsurgical mandibular growth. There were no statistically significant differences (P >.05) between the 2 groups for maximal incisal opening, lateral excursions, or subjective jaw function before surgery. Presurgical growth differed significantly (P <.05), with group 2 showing more active growth. At the long-term follow-up, no differences were found in lateral excursions or subjective jaw function. There was a statistically significant difference in maximum incisal opening (P <.01), with a greater increase in group 2, as well as a statistically significant difference (P <.05) in cephalometric stability, with group 2 being much more stable at long-term follow-up. All patients in group 1 grew back into skeletal and occlusal Class III relationships and required secondary intervention. Only 1 patient in group 2 required secondary surgery, involving maxillary surgery to correct postsurgical transverse maxillary relapse; the mandible was stable at long-term follow-up. The results of this study showed that patients with active condylar hyperplasia treated with high condylectomy, articular disc repositioning, and orthognathic surgery have stable, predictable outcomes compared with those treated with orthognathic surgery alone.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Male, Reoperation, Hyperplasia, Adolescent, Cephalometry, Oral Surgical Procedures, Mandibular Condyle, Mandible, Malocclusion, Angle Class III, Treatment Outcome, Facial Asymmetry, Temporomandibular Joint Disc, Prognathism, Humans, Female, Mandibular Diseases, Range of Motion, Articular, Follow-Up Studies, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    165
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 1%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 1%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
165
Top 1%
Top 1%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!