Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Method for characterization of multilayer substrates with complementary split-ring resonators

Authors: Diego Alejandro Sarmiento Narvaez; Alonso Corona Chavez; Jose Luis Olvera Cervantes; Juan Mateo Meza Arenas; Tejinder Kaur;

Method for characterization of multilayer substrates with complementary split-ring resonators

Abstract

This paper presents a methodology based on the use of multiple complementary split ring resonators (CSRRs) in square form to obtain the relative permittivity of individual layers of a multilayer dielectric sample. The sensor uses CSRRs with different maximum penetration depths to analyze various sections of the sample. The methodology uses the resonant frequency change, which depends on the maximum measurable thickness of the resonator and dielectric permittivity of the sample. Various design parameters affecting the maximum measurable thickness, such as slot width and resonator size, were analyzed. Subsequently, a sensor consisting of two resonators at 2.4 and 7.4 GHz with maximum penetration depths of 5.3 and 3.0 mm, respectively, was designed to measure a two-layer sample. Each layer has a thickness of 3.0 mm. The sensor was tested satisfactorily with four commercial dielectric substrates, which were stacked into 16 different combinations. The results show great accuracy in the characterization of dielectric constant with an error smaller than 0.2% for the first layer and smaller than 9.4% for the second layer. The proposed method works correctly for materials that offer constant permittivities in the lower microwave region (<8 GHz).

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    2
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
2
Top 10%
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!