Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
Physics of Fluidsarrow_drop_down
Physics of Fluids
Article . 2025 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
addClaim

Multi-scale approach: Structure–texture relationship of meat and meat analogues

Authors: Elle Ina Wilhelm; Luiza Fritzsche; Christoph Simon Hundschell; Thomas A. Vilgis; David Olivier Schmelzeisen; Anja Maria Wagemans;

Multi-scale approach: Structure–texture relationship of meat and meat analogues

Abstract

Plant-based meat analogues are considered a sustainable substitute for meat. However, the current attempts to reproduce the visible fibrous structure on a macro scale (1 mm) have not yet achieved the desired texture properties. The role of the meso-scale fiber structure (50–200 μm) in the meat texture remains uncertain. To characterize the texture properties, this study employed Warner–Bratzler shear force tests and texture profile analysis, comparing cuts that were parallel and perpendicular to the fiber direction. Scanning electron microscopy was employed for the purpose of structural characterization. Anisotropy and texture properties were observed to differ between the meat and the meat analogues. The meat exhibited a fibrous structure at both the macro and meso scales, while the meat analogues displayed a porous structure without a clear fiber direction from the meso scale onward. The texture of meat is primarily determined by the connective tissue and muscle fibers, whereas the texture of meat analogues is mainly influenced by the fibers. This study elucidates the structure–texture relationships of meat and meat analogues at macro and meso scales, developing a mechanistic model to explain their differing responses to mechanical stress. These findings are crucial for improving the texture properties of meat analogues, advancing their ability to mimic meat's texture.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!