
pmid: 39476013
The acceleration in the field of data science is well known [see, e.g., D. Donoho, J. Comput. Graph. Stat. 26(4), 745–766 (2017) and references therein]. Improvements in technology for acquisition, storage, and processing have made unheard of amounts of data available to scientists; in parallel with that, the pace of methodological advance has also been rapid; with new techniques and packages becoming available, it seems, every day. With these affordances come many challenges, notably the volume and variety of the data [Fan et al., Natl. Sci. Rev. 1(2), 293–314 (2014)]. In this Perspective piece, we examine a different challenge—how to choose and use the right analysis method—and make an argument for the sharing of raw data.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
