Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
Physics of Fluidsarrow_drop_down
Physics of Fluids
Article . 2024 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
addClaim

Effect of airfoil thickness on gust–airfoil interaction noise

Authors: Shujie Jiang; JiangTao Zhao; Zhen-Guo Yan; Rongping Zhang; Xunnian Wang; Zhiwei Hu;

Effect of airfoil thickness on gust–airfoil interaction noise

Abstract

Interaction between turbulence and an airfoil is a significant aerodynamic noise source for many engineering applications when turbulence in the wake of upstream blades interacts with the leading edge of downstream blades. Modeling the oncoming turbulence as harmonic gusts is a common approach to study the noise generated by turbulence–airfoil interaction. In former studies, it has been found that the sound reduces with the increase in airfoil thickness. However, this is not always true for high-reduced frequency cases. This paper studies airfoil thickness effects using a computational aeroacoustics approach based on the spectral/hp element method. It is found that the sound pressure decreases with the increase in thickness for low-reduced frequency gusts. However, the sound pressure increases in the upstream direction and declines downstream with the increase in thickness for high-reduced frequency cases. To reveal its mechanism, a semi-analytical method and the convective Ffowcs Williams–Hawkings equation are used for low- and high-reduced frequency, respectively, to analyze the radiated noise. For low-reduced frequency cases, the sound reduction due to thickness is caused by the decrease in amplitude in the leading edge region and the increase in phase difference along the airfoil. For high-reduced frequency cases, the phase difference in the upstream observer is much more significant than the downstream observer's due to the convective effect. The increase in phase difference results in a cancellation effect, which leads to a different behavior upstream.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    2
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
2
Top 10%
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!