
doi: 10.1063/5.0184479
pmid: 38149738
This study looked for a way to evaluate the validity of previously suggested models for describing the spin-selective recombination of radical pairs. As an example, for analysis, we used the conventional model, the model by Jones and Hore [Chem. Phys. Lett. 488, 90 (2010)], and the model by Salikhov [Am. J. Phys. Chem. 11, 67 (2022)]. To do this, analytical solutions to the evolution of the radical pair density matrix due to a radical pair’s spin-selective recombination and singlet–triplet transitions in a strong magnetic field were obtained for the conventional model and the Jones and Hore model. Spin interactions included in the Hamiltonian were time-independent exchange interactions as well as Zeeman and hyperfine interactions. The most striking difference between the models’ predictions appeared when considering the fraction of singlet pairs among all currently existing ones. In the Jones and Hore model, this ratio has the form of damped oscillations for any values of the spin-hamiltonian parameters. The conventional model and the Salikhov model both predicted that this ratio had the form of undamped oscillations in the absence of exchange interaction and at a sufficiently low recombination rate. Besides, the conventional model predicts the possibility of a resonance-like behavior of this ratio when singlet–triplet transitions in a part of the radical pair ensemble are completely suppressed by tuning the magnetic field strength. Possible experimental conditions in which distinguishing between the models seems to be most straightforward were suggested.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
