Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
Physics of Fluidsarrow_drop_down
Physics of Fluids
Article . 2023 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
addClaim

Stable monolithic immersed boundary projection method for particle sedimentation with heat transfer at density ratios near unity

Authors: Tiantian Xu; Jung-Il Choi;

Stable monolithic immersed boundary projection method for particle sedimentation with heat transfer at density ratios near unity

Abstract

This study proposes a highly stable and efficient monolithic immersed boundary projection method with staggered time discretization for particle sedimentation with heat transfer at density ratios near unity. To achieve the implicit coupling of fluid and solid motion, the proposed method uses a monolithic approach that incorporates temperature, fluid velocities, particle velocities, momentum forcing, energy forcing, and pressure. Subsequently, a two-step approximate lower–upper decomposition is used to decouple the complex large system. Two-dimensional and three-dimensional (3D) single particle sedimentation at various Grashof numbers and density ratios verifies the ability of the proposed method to handle particle sedimentation at density ratios near unity. Moreover, the proposed method demonstrates its clear advantages by successfully addressing both stability issues and spurious oscillations. Furthermore, simulation with the proposed method was performed for 3D two- and multi-particle sedimentation with heat transfer to demonstrate the robustness of the proposed method. The investigation of the effects of density ratio and Grashof numbers on particle sedimentation reveals a significant influence of buoyancy force, particularly for relatively lighter particles. An increase in the drag coefficient for multi-particle sedimentation is observed, owing to interactions between particles, and the Grashof number exerts a pronounced influence, particularly at low-density ratios.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    6
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
6
Top 10%
Average
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!