
This research addresses the challenge of characterizing the complexity and unpredictability of basins within various dynamical systems. The main focus is on demonstrating the efficiency of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) in this field. Conventional methods become computationally demanding when analyzing multiple basins of attraction across different parameters of dynamical systems. Our research presents an innovative approach that employs CNN architectures for this purpose, showcasing their superior performance in comparison to conventional methods. We conduct a comparative analysis of various CNN models, highlighting the effectiveness of our proposed characterization method while acknowledging the validity of prior approaches. The findings not only showcase the potential of CNNs but also emphasize their significance in advancing the exploration of diverse behaviors within dynamical systems.
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Computer Science - Machine Learning, Machine learning, Chaos, Convolutional neural networks, basins of attraction, Machine Learning (cs.LG)
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Computer Science - Machine Learning, Machine learning, Chaos, Convolutional neural networks, basins of attraction, Machine Learning (cs.LG)
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 5 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
