Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Inertial focusing of particles and cells in the microfluidic labyrinth device: Role of sharp turns

Authors: Anirudh Gangadhar; Siva A. Vanapalli;

Inertial focusing of particles and cells in the microfluidic labyrinth device: Role of sharp turns

Abstract

Inertial, size-based focusing was investigated in the microfluidic labyrinth device consisting of several U-shaped turns along with circular loops. Turns are associated with tight curvature and, therefore, induce strong Dean forces for separating particles; however, systematic studies exploring this possibility do not exist. We characterized the focusing dynamics of different-sized rigid particles, cancer cells, and white blood cells over a range of fluid Reynolds numbers Ref. Streak widths of the focused particle streams at all the turns showed intermittent fluctuations that were substantial for smaller particles and at higher Ref. In contrast, cell streaks were less prone to fluctuations. Computational fluid dynamics simulations revealed the existence of strong turn-induced Dean vortices, which help explain the intermittent fluctuations seen in particle focusing. Next, we developed a measure of pairwise separability to evaluate the quality of separation between focused streams of two different particle sizes. Using this, we assessed the impact of a single sharp turn on separation. In general, the separability was found to vary significantly as particles traversed the tight-curvature U-turn. Comparing the separability at the entry and exit sections, we found that turns either improved or reduced separation between different-sized particles depending on Ref. Finally, we evaluated the separability at the downstream expansion section to quantify the performance of the labyrinth device in terms of achieving size-based enrichment of particles and cells. Overall, our results show that turns are better for cell focusing and separation given that they are more immune to curvature-driven fluctuations in comparison to rigid particles.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    8
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
8
Top 10%
Average
Top 10%
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!