
arXiv: 2202.13993
Measurement incompatibility is one of the most striking examples of how quantum physics is different from classical physics. Two measurements are incompatible if they cannot arise via classical post-processing from a third one. A natural way to quantify incompatibility is in terms of noise robustness. In the present article, we review recent results on the maximal noise robustness of incompatible measurements, which have been obtained by the present authors using free spectrahedra, and rederive them using tensor norms. In this way, we make them accessible to a broader audience from quantum information theory and mathematical physics and contribute to the fruitful interactions between Banach space theory and quantum information theory. We also describe incompatibility witnesses using the tensor norm and matrix convex set duality, emphasizing the relation between the different notions of witnesses.
Quantum Physics, math-ph, FOS: Physical sciences, Quantum measurement theory, state operations, state preparations, Mathematical Physics (math-ph), math.MP, quant-ph, Quantum information, communication, networks (quantum-theoretic aspects), Quantum computation, Operator spaces and completely bounded maps, Dilations, extensions, compressions of linear operators, Quantum Physics (quant-ph), [PHYS.QPHY] Physics [physics]/Quantum Physics [quant-ph], Mathematical Physics
Quantum Physics, math-ph, FOS: Physical sciences, Quantum measurement theory, state operations, state preparations, Mathematical Physics (math-ph), math.MP, quant-ph, Quantum information, communication, networks (quantum-theoretic aspects), Quantum computation, Operator spaces and completely bounded maps, Dilations, extensions, compressions of linear operators, Quantum Physics (quant-ph), [PHYS.QPHY] Physics [physics]/Quantum Physics [quant-ph], Mathematical Physics
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
