Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Journal of Applied P...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Role of transferred graphene on atomic interaction of GaAs for remote epitaxy

Authors: Hyunseok Kim; Jong Chan Kim; Yoongu Jeong; Jimyeong Yu; Kuangye Lu; Doyoon Lee; Naeun Kim; +3 Authors

Role of transferred graphene on atomic interaction of GaAs for remote epitaxy

Abstract

Remote epitaxy is a recently discovered type of epitaxy, wherein single-crystalline thin films can be grown on graphene-coated substrates following the crystallinity of the substrate via remote interaction through graphene. Although remote epitaxy provides a pathway to form freestanding membranes by controlled exfoliation of grown film at the graphene interface, implementing remote epitaxy is not straightforward because atomically precise control of interface is required. Here, we unveil the role of the graphene–substrate interface on the remote epitaxy of GaAs by investigating the interface at the atomic scale. By comparing remote epitaxy on wet-transferred and dry-transferred graphene, we show that interfacial oxide layer formed at the graphene–substrate interface hinders remote interaction through graphene when wet-transferred graphene is employed, which is confirmed by an increase of interatomic distance through graphene and also by the formation of polycrystalline films on graphene. On the other hand, when dry-transferred graphene is employed, the interface is free of native oxide, and single-crystalline remote epitaxial films are formed on graphene, with the interatomic distance between the epilayer and the substrate matching with the theoretically predicted value. The first atomic layer of the grown film on graphene is vertically aligned with the top layer of the substrate with these atoms having different polarities, substantiating the remote interaction of adatoms with the substrate through graphene. These results directly show the impact of interface properties formed by different graphene transfer methods on remote epitaxy.

Countries
Korea (Republic of), United States
Keywords

530

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    38
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
38
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Green
bronze