
doi: 10.1063/1.873898
Recent developments in gyrokinetic-magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) theory and in electromagnetic gyrokinetic particle simulations raise the question of consistency between the gyrokinetic model and the fluid model. Due to the special characteristics of the guiding center coordinates, it is a nontrivial exercise to show this consistency. In this paper it is shown, in a very general setting, that the gyrokinetic theory and the fluid equations do give an equivalent description of plasma equilibrium (∂/∂t=0). The fluid continuity equation and momentum equation for equilibrium plasmas are recovered entirely from the gyrokinetic theory. However, it was Spitzer who first realized the importance of consistency between guiding-center motion and fluid equations. In particular, he studied the “apparent paradoxical result” regarding the difference between perpendicular particle flow and guiding-center flow, which will be referred to as the Spitzer paradox in this paper. By recovering the fluid equations from the gyrokinetic theory, we automatically resolve the Spitzer paradox, whose essence is how the perpendicular current and flow are microscopically generated from particles’ guiding-center motion. The mathematical construction in the gyrokinetic theory which relates observable quantities in the laboratory frame to the distribution function in the guiding-center coordinates is consistent with Spitzer’s original physical picture, while today’s gyrokinetic-MHD theory covers a much wider range of problems in a much more general and quantitative way.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 21 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
