
doi: 10.1063/1.60010
This paper addresses the 2-stage RC ladder paradox presented by Abbott et al. at the previous UPoN conference. It is clarified which of the previously obtained contradictory results are correct and which are wrong. A physical interpretation for success and failure of different approaches is given.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
