
Standard density functional approximations often give questionable results for odd-electron radical complexes, with the error typically attributed to self-interaction. In density corrected density functional theory (DC-DFT), certain classes of density functional theory calculations are significantly improved by using densities more accurate than the self-consistent densities. We discuss how to identify such cases, and how DC-DFT applies more generally. To illustrate, we calculate potential energy surfaces of HO·Cl− and HO·H2O complexes using various common approximate functionals, with and without this density correction. Commonly used approximations yield wrongly shaped surfaces and/or incorrect minima when calculated self consistently, while yielding almost identical shapes and minima when density corrected. This improvement is retained even in the presence of implicit solvent.
Models, Molecular, Chemical Physics (physics.chem-ph), Chemical Physics, physics.chem-ph, Molecular, Water, FOS: Physical sciences, Chemical, Condensed Matter - Other Condensed Matter, Engineering, Models, Chemical, Models, cond-mat.other, Physics - Chemical Physics, Physical Sciences, Chemical Sciences, Hydroxides, Computer Simulation, Artifacts, Algorithms, Other Condensed Matter (cond-mat.other)
Models, Molecular, Chemical Physics (physics.chem-ph), Chemical Physics, physics.chem-ph, Molecular, Water, FOS: Physical sciences, Chemical, Condensed Matter - Other Condensed Matter, Engineering, Models, Chemical, Models, cond-mat.other, Physics - Chemical Physics, Physical Sciences, Chemical Sciences, Hydroxides, Computer Simulation, Artifacts, Algorithms, Other Condensed Matter (cond-mat.other)
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 99 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
