Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

On non-negativity of Fukui function indices. II

Authors: Ram Kinkar Roy; Kimihiko Hirao; Sourav Pal;

On non-negativity of Fukui function indices. II

Abstract

In this article we have tried to critically analyze the factors which cause the condensed Fukui function (FF) indices [f(r)] to attain a negative value in some cases. The evaluation of condensed FF indices needs finite-difference approximation to the electronic charge densities, and the finite-difference approximation needs partitioning of the electronic charge to the constituent atoms. In a previous article [J. Chem. Phys. 110, 8236 (1999)] we have argued that the probable factors, which cause the FF indices to appear negative in some cases, may be (i) the improper charge partitioning techniques adopted to evaluate f(r); (ii) large change in the electron number (ΔN=1) when f(r) is evaluated in condensed form using the finite-difference approximation. In this article we want to focus more on the first factor. The present study shows through pictorial as well as numerical demonstrations of the charge-density difference [ρneutral(r̄)−ρcation(r̄) and ρanion(r̄)−ρneutral(r̄)] plots, how the negative condensed FF value appears with the use of improper charge partitioning and how the use of Hirshfeld partitioning can solve this problem.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    110
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
110
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!