
doi: 10.1063/1.3435389
The main goal of this article is to show that there are qualitative and quantitative differences between continuum fields obtained by the coarse‐graining of systems comprising discrete constituents at finite or very large (“infinite”) resolution. This is demonstrated by two examples: the stress field is symmetric for infinite coarse‐graining scales but can be asymmetric for finite resolution; the classical expression for the elastic energy density needs to be corrected by a term that vanishes in the limit of infinite coarse‐graining scale. The article also presents a brief and somewhat biased introduction to the subject of coarse‐graining (or homogenization or averaging) and a summary of part of the recent and not‐so‐recent work by the author and some of his collaborators. It is shown that it is possible to coarse grain discrete systems in such a way that the fields are smooth and the resolution controlled. In particular, the use of smooth coarse graining functions of pre‐determined resolution ensures tha...
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
