Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

EMAT and Eddy Current Dual Probe for Detecting Surface and Near-Surface Defects

Authors: R. S. Edwards;

EMAT and Eddy Current Dual Probe for Detecting Surface and Near-Surface Defects

Abstract

In non‐destructive testing (NDT) it is often preferable to test samples using several different techniques, in order to gain a higher probability of detection and a more reliable characterisation of each defect. However, this can lead to an increase in testing time and cost. A probe containing several NDT devices will give this accuracy and reliability, with the testing speed of using only one technique. We present initial results using a dual‐probe containing a pulsed eddy current probe and a pair of electro‐magnetic acoustic transducers generating ultrasonic surface waves in a pitch‐catch manner. These two techniques are complimentary and are sensitive to surface and near surface defects, and no detrimental interference between the two techniques is observed. As both techniques are non‐contact there is the possibility of use in hot or moving environments. The results from both can be combined using data fusion to give a higher probability of detection and more reliable sizing. Measurements of aluminium and steel samples containing manufactured and real defects are presented.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    4
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
4
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!