Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Electrical capacitance of the unit cube

Authors: Chi-Ok Hwang; Michael Mascagni;

Electrical capacitance of the unit cube

Abstract

It is well known that there is no analytical expression for the electrical capacitance of a cube, even though it has been claimed that one can compute this capacitance numerically to high precision. However, there have been some disparities between reported numerical results of the capacitance of the unit cube. In this article, the “walk on planes” (WOP) algorithm [M. L. Mansfield, J. F. Douglas, and E. J. Garboczi, Phys. Rev. E 64, 061401 (2001)] is used to compute the capacitance of the unit cube. With WOP, we remove the error from the ε-absorption layer commonly used in “walk on spheres” computations so that there is no inherent error introduced in these WOP computations except the intrinsic Monte Carlo sampling error of size O(N1/2). This WOP technique comes from the isomorphism, provided by probabilistic potential theory, between the electrostatic Dirichlet problem on a conducting surface, and the corresponding Brownian motion first-passage expectation. The numerical result we obtain with WOP, 0.660 678 2±1×10−7, supports the deterministic calculations by Read [F. H. Read, J. Comp. Phys. 133, 1 (1997)], the results by Given et al. [J. A. Given, J. B. Hubbard, and J. F. Douglas, J. Chem. Phys. 106, 3721 (1997)] and our previous results [C.-O. Hwang and M. Mascagni, J. Korean Phys. Soc. 42, L1 (2003); M. Mascagni and N. A. Simonov, J. Comp. Phys. (in press)]. Also, it is noted that the exact value conjectured by Hubbard and Douglas is inconsistent with our calculations, and that some other calculations fall outside our error bounds.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    34
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
34
Top 10%
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!