
Use this worksheet to assess the: (a) availability of manuscript data, models, code, directions, and other digital artifacts; and (b) reproducibility of figures, tables, and other results presented in the manuscript. Should you answer “no” or “not sure” to any question, skip to Section IV and then answer the final questions to provide the authors constructive feedback to improve their repository and materials. The Journal asks that AERs and reproducibility reviewers take no more than four hours to assess the reproducibility of a manuscript’s results. Should an assessment take longer, skip to Section IV and provide the authors feedback on the steps that took a long time and how the authors can better organize their repository and materials to reduce the time to assess result reproducibility.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
