
Many think that formal social control refers to a criminal justice system in which there are rather many state organs/agencies (eg, police, courts, prisons) to maintain public order, while informal social control refers to the broader social system. This paper argues that China has traditionally established a social control system by making use of the societal inner layer (belief controls such as Confucianism and socialization programmes) and the exterior layer (structural controls such as the baojia system and auxiliary institutions, or the work-unit, danwei), and that this system has continued in the People's Republic. Although this mechanism is generally recognized as an informal social control, it is argued that, historically as well as theoretically, China has regarded this mechanism as constituting formal social control.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
