
doi: 10.1057/be.2011.7
Despite current media reporting that assumes new orders for durable goods (NDOG) are an indicator of future economic activity, the new orders series does not improve forecasts of durable goods shipments. This result is true for both aggregate and industry-level measures of new orders, using several econometric techniques. New orders may have been a more useful measure of future shipments in the 1960s than today. This failure may be caused by changes in manufacturing methods. In addition, the structure of the economy may have made new orders less relevant. Also, the new orders series may suffer from measurement problems. Moreover, parameter uncertainty and instability may overwhelm any available information in the new orders series. Analysts should consider reducing the emphasis placed on NDOG as a measure of future economic activity.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 7 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
