
R. v. Zundel is the only criminal prosecution of a Holocaust denier in the common law world. As we have seen, this complicated life for trial judge Hugh Locke, whose controversial refusal to take judicial notice of the Holocaust was grounded on common law norms of adversarialism. But this was not Locke’s only difficult ruling. Throughout the trial, he had to fit prosecution and defense evidence about the Holocaust into the strictures of the common law rule against hearsay. This chapter outlines the hurdles Locke faced, the solutions he reached, and the problems his solutions created.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
