
Chapter 2 has established that terrorism is inextricably linked to communication. There are, however, two major obstacles to understanding the role of communication. On the one hand is the lack of solid explanatory frameworks in the field of terrorism studies within which to “place” the exchange, sharing, and processing of information. On the other hand is the existence of assumptions shaped by the way terrorism has been studied over decades. They do not even allow us to register communication as relevant to the study of terrorism — what has been called in the previous chapter the “terrorism paradigm.” The combination of these aspects is an hindrance to understanding the role of communication technologies, media organisations, and the effects that messages carried by the media can have, for instance, in the individual development of radical views, mobilisation of terrorist groups across borders, or the weaving of a terrorist plot.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
