
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>handle: 10419/63386
The paper uses the Lewis model as a framework for examining the labour market progress of two labour-abundant countries, China and South Africa, towards labour shortage and generally rising labour real incomes. In the acuteness of their rural-urban divides, forms of migrant labour, rapid rural-urban migration, and high and rising real wages in the formal sector, the two economies are surprisingly similar. They differ, however, in the dynamism of their formal sector growth of output and employment, and in the growth of their labour forces. Whereas China - a labour-surplus economy par excellence despite unemployment until recently taking only a disguised form - is moving rapidly in the direction of labour scarcity, South Africa - which historically has been short of labour - is moving towards increased labour surplus in the form of open unemployment. The paper draws on research previously conducted by the author in separate research projects on the two countries.
China, ddc:330, Economics, Labour economics, Arbeitsmarkt, J0, O5, Landflucht, O4, China; South Africa; Lewis model; wages; labour supply; rural-urban migration; unemployment, China, South Africa, Lewis Model, Wages, Labour Supply, Rural-Urban Migration, Unemployment, J4, Entwicklungstheorie, Südafrika, Econometrics, Arbeitsangebot, jel: jel:O4, jel: jel:J0, jel: jel:O5, jel: jel:J4
China, ddc:330, Economics, Labour economics, Arbeitsmarkt, J0, O5, Landflucht, O4, China; South Africa; Lewis model; wages; labour supply; rural-urban migration; unemployment, China, South Africa, Lewis Model, Wages, Labour Supply, Rural-Urban Migration, Unemployment, J4, Entwicklungstheorie, Südafrika, Econometrics, Arbeitsangebot, jel: jel:O4, jel: jel:J0, jel: jel:O5, jel: jel:J4
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).  | 11 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.  | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).  | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.  | Top 10% | 
