
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>Environmental policy is designed within the confluence of markets, missing markets, and no markets. Within this mixture, economists offer working rules to help make outcomes more efficient, usually based on ideas formed by rational choice theory. The rules ask decision-makers to compare benefits in relation to costs, to account for the risks and gains across time and space for winners and losers, to facilitate the movement of resources from low-value uses to high-value uses, and to equate incremental gains per cost across policy actions. The environmental economic challenge is to find effective decision rules that will help move an economy towards efficient resource allocation in the face of market failure, for example, externalities, non-rival consumption, non-excludable net benefits, nonconvexities and asymmetric information (see Hanley, Shogren and White, 2007).
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
