
doi: 10.1056/nejmc1103019
To the Editor: In their review article on hypoxia and inflammation, Eltzschig and Carmeliet (Feb. 17 issue)1 were thorough in promoting the role of hypoxia-inducible transcription factor (HIF) and related mechanisms to regain homeostasis in hypoxic tissue environments. Although very exacting in its discussion, the review unfortunately failed to include other, equally important mechanisms that lead to inflammation from hypoxic–ischemic reperfusion injury. I am referring in part to the importance of the inflammasome, and in particular to the NLRP3 inflammasome that responds to danger-associated molecular patterns (e.g., urates, free ATP) resulting from nucleoprotein catabolism induced by such injury. Such stimulation leads to secretion of proinflammatory cytokines, in particular interleukin-1β,2 resulting in neutrophilic inflammation. The NLRP3 inflammasome mechanism was first discovered in autosomal autoinflammatory syndromes, namely cryopyrin-associated periodic syndromes, and these disorders have responded beautifully to interleukin-1–targeted therapies. Now there is current interest among several pharmaceutical companies to test similar therapies in inflammatory disorders caused by hypoxic–ischemic reperfusion injury.2-4
Inflammation, Sleep Apnea, Obstructive, Inflammasomes, Hypertension, Pulmonary, Hemodynamics, Altitude Sickness, Atherosclerosis, Disease Models, Animal, Mice, Reperfusion Injury, NLR Family, Pyrin Domain-Containing 3 Protein, Animals, Humans, Hypoxia-Inducible Factor 1, Carrier Proteins, Hypoxia
Inflammation, Sleep Apnea, Obstructive, Inflammasomes, Hypertension, Pulmonary, Hemodynamics, Altitude Sickness, Atherosclerosis, Disease Models, Animal, Mice, Reperfusion Injury, NLR Family, Pyrin Domain-Containing 3 Protein, Animals, Humans, Hypoxia-Inducible Factor 1, Carrier Proteins, Hypoxia
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 544 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 0.1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
