
pmid: 17354181
Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has recently been developed for one-piece resection of gastric tumors. In order to improve patients' quality of life, it may be desirable to use the same technique for rectal tumors.35 consecutive patients with rectal tumors were enrolled. ESD was carried out using the same technique as for the stomach. The efficacy, technical feasibility, operation time, complications, and follow-up results were assessed.The mean size of the epithelial tumors was 26.2 +/- 14.0 mm, and the rates of one-piece resection and one-piece resection with tumor-free margins were 73.3% (22 of 30) and 70.0% (21 of 30), respectively. The median operation time was 70 min (range 8-360 min). All five carcinoid tumors were completely resected. No patient needed blood transfusion or had the complication of problematic bleeding. Perforation during ESD occurred in one patient (2.9%), who was managed with conservative medical treatment after endoscopic closure of the perforation. Excluding seven patients, who either underwent additional surgery or whose follow-up period was less than 1 year, all 23 patients with epithelial tumors were free of recurrence during a mean follow-up period of 25.7 months (range 12-53 months).ESD was thus found to be feasible for the treatment of rectal tumors, with promising results although the follow-up periods were short. ESD may therefore be indicated for rectal tumors which are not resectable en bloc by conventional procedures, in order to improve the patients' quality of life.
Adenoma, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Rectal Neoplasms, Carcinoid Tumor, Adenocarcinoma, Middle Aged, Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal, Feasibility Studies, Humans, Female, Aged, Follow-Up Studies
Adenoma, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Rectal Neoplasms, Carcinoid Tumor, Adenocarcinoma, Middle Aged, Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal, Feasibility Studies, Humans, Female, Aged, Follow-Up Studies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 90 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
