Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Indications for Cholangioscopy

Authors: C L, Liguory; J F, Lefebvre; D, Bonnel; F, Cornud; J P, Etienne;

Indications for Cholangioscopy

Abstract

Cholangioscopy permits new diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. It can be performed via the peroral route when anatomical conditions are suitable. This procedure was attempted in 6 cases (lithiasis in 5, malignant stenosis in 1): cholangioscopy proved possible in 4 cases, and lithotripsy was successful in 2 cases out of 3. Percutaneous transhepatic cholangioscopy was performed when peroral cholangioscopy was not possible (non-accessible papilla, hepatico-jejunostomy), or failed. In 17 patients with common bile duct (CBD) stones, unextractable by conventional procedures 14 underwent a cholangioscopy with electrohydraulic lithotripsy. Sixteen had complete clearance of the CBD. Cholangioscopy was attempted in 18 patients with intra-hepatic lithiasis. Lithotripsy was necessary in 10 cases and stenosis dilatation in 8. Results were excellent in 15 patients, and good in 3 with diffuse intra-hepatic lithiasis. In the case of lithiasis, the complication rate of the procedure was 29.5% and 27.7% for CBD and intrahepatic stones, respectively, and the mortality rate was 8.5% (n = 3). These complications (bleeding and cholangitis) are closely related to the percutaneous route. In malignant stenosis (n = 5), cholangioscopy was performed for diagnostic purposes in one case, extraction of a stent in one case and endobiliary laser treatment in 3 cases.

Keywords

Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Endoscopes, Lithotripsy, Humans, Endoscopy, Bile Duct Diseases, Middle Aged, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    20
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
20
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!