
doi: 10.1055/s-2002-19823
pmid: 11823929
With the advent of new biomaterials and surgical techniques, the reconstructive surgeon has a wider range of treatment modalities for the rehabilitation and reconstruction of craniofacial skeletal deformities than ever before. These innovative substances act as true bone graft substitutes, thereby allowing the surgeon to avoid the use of autogenous bone grafts and their associated donor site morbidity. Surgeons have long been interested in producing a composite graft that can heal faster by induction, incorporate with surrounding tissues, and be remodeled to resemble native bone. Currently, there are a host of bone graft substitutes available that vary in both their composition and properties. Craniomaxillofacial surgeons must therefore become comfortable with numerous biomaterials to best tailor the treatment for each patient individually. Ongoing investigations into the next phase of tissue engineering will continue to bring us closer to the ability to regenerate or replace bone.
Bone Regeneration, Bone Transplantation, Tissue Engineering, Skull, Osteogenesis, Distraction, Biocompatible Materials, Prostheses and Implants, Plastic Surgery Procedures, Osteogenesis, Bone Morphogenetic Proteins, Bone Substitutes, Humans
Bone Regeneration, Bone Transplantation, Tissue Engineering, Skull, Osteogenesis, Distraction, Biocompatible Materials, Prostheses and Implants, Plastic Surgery Procedures, Osteogenesis, Bone Morphogenetic Proteins, Bone Substitutes, Humans
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 51 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
