Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Antiphospholipid Antibodies: Predictive Value of Laboratory Tests

Authors: M, Galli; G, Finazzi; T, Barbui;

Antiphospholipid Antibodies: Predictive Value of Laboratory Tests

Abstract

aPL antibodies are a wide and heterogeneous family of autoantibodies, formerly believed to be directed at anionic phospholipids. In recent years they have been shown to be directed at plasma proteins bound to suitable (phospholipid) anionic surface: beta 2-GPI and prothrombin are the best known and characterized antigens, which are recognized by aCL antibodies and most Lupus Anticoagulants, respectively. The presence of these antibodies has been associated with arterial and venous thrombosis, recurrent miscarriages and thrombocytopenia in the so-called "Antiphospholipid Syndrome". Retrospective and "cross-sectional" studies have established the role of aCL antibodies and Lupus Anticoagulants as risk factors for both venous and arterial thrombosis, the most common clinical manifestations of APS. Prospective studies performed in different patients' populations have validated the association between aCL antibodies and Lupus Anticoagulants with venous and, possibly, arterial thrombosis. Along with the concept of the heterogenity of aPL antibodies there is the observation that among Lupus Anticoagulants aCL-type A, but not LA antibodies, appear to represent a risk factor for thrombosis. However, informations on the predictive value of the various laboratory tests with respect to thrombosis are still rather limited. It is, therefore, necessary to continue the development and standardization of assays that selectively identify aPL antibodies associated with an increased risk of thrombosis, in order to help the clinicians to establish the most appropriate therapeutic strategies for the prevention of the thromboembolic complication of APS.

Keywords

Clinical Laboratory Techniques, Predictive Value of Tests, Lupus Coagulation Inhibitor, Antibodies, Antiphospholipid, Humans, Thrombosis, Prospective Studies, Thrombophlebitis, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    56
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
56
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!