
pmid: 10913969
Allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT) is the only treatment modality that has consistently been demonstrated to cure patients with the myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Since the early 1980s, numerous publications have reported the results with BMT for over 700 patients with MDS and the lead patients are now disease-free for more than 16 years. Overall, these studies show that approximately 40% of patients are likely to be cured with allogeneic BMT. The best results have been reported for patients with refractory anemia who receive marrow from fully matched related donors, with 75% long-term disease-free survival rates. Factors that are associated with an increased risk of relapse and, thereby, shorter disease-free survival, include increased blast percentage and poor risk karyotype. Factors that are associated with an increased risk of non-relapse mortality and, in some studies, shorter disease-free survival, include longer disease duration, advanced patient age, therapy-related MDS, male patients, and use of mismatched or unrelated donors. However, favorable results have been seen in small studies of patients 55-66 years of age and in patients with refractory anemia undergoing matched unrelated donor BMT. Allogeneic BMT is appropriate therapy for patients with high or intermediate risk disease (risk category based on the International Prognostic Scoring System). The use of allogeneic BMT for patients with low risk disease is not well defined, but may be appropriate for particularly young individuals or those with a life-threatening single cytopenia.
Treatment Outcome, Risk Factors, Myelodysplastic Syndromes, Cytogenetic Analysis, Humans, Bone Marrow Transplantation
Treatment Outcome, Risk Factors, Myelodysplastic Syndromes, Cytogenetic Analysis, Humans, Bone Marrow Transplantation
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 36 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
