
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>pmid: 11120607
This article overviews the emerging problem of antifungaldrug resistance in Aspergillus. Fluconazole and ketocona-zole (KCZ) are inactive against Aspergillus. Validation oftesting procedures for the detection of itraconazole (ITZ)resistance in Aspergillus fumigatusin 19971,2were furthervalidated with posaconazole (SCH-56592)3,4and voricona-zole (VCZ)5(Hitchcock, personal communication). Work isongoing to validate testing procedures for azoles innon-fumigatus Aspergilli.In contrast to the successful validation of azole suscep-tibility testing ofAspergillus, successful validation ofamphotericin B (AmB) testing has been problematic, withthe probable exception ofAspergillus terreus.6,7This article summarizes data from our laboratory, con-trasts it with that in the literature, and makes recommen-dations for subsequent work to further clarify thesituation. The new group of antifungal drugs, the can-dins, is not discussed and information on terbinafine istabulated only for comparison. Resistance in flucytosine is also not discussed.
Azoles, Antifungal Agents, Drug Resistance, Microbial, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Sterols, Aspergillus, Amphotericin B, Mutation, Animals, Aspergillosis, Humans
Azoles, Antifungal Agents, Drug Resistance, Microbial, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Sterols, Aspergillus, Amphotericin B, Mutation, Animals, Aspergillosis, Humans
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 148 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
