Equivalence of bioimpedance and thermodilution in measuring cardiac index after cardiac surgery
Copyright policy )Equivalence of bioimpedance and thermodilution in measuring cardiac index after cardiac surgery
To compare thoracic electrical bioimpedance (TEB) cardiography versus pulmonary artery thermodilution (TD) derived cardiac index in patients after cardiopulmonary bypass.Prospective, blinded electronic data collection.Intensive care unit of a military hospital.Post-cardiopulmonary bypass patients for primary comparison between technologies (n = 20) and patients for comparison of variability within each technology (n = 20).None.Cardiac index values by TEB or TD were collected simultaneously. Linear regression, Lin's concordance correlation coefficient, bias, and precision measures within the large data set group and within each patient over time were calculated. Linearity in regression and Lin's concordance correlation coefficient of 0.99 were shown. A bias of 0.07 L/min/m(2) and precision of 0.40 L/min/m(2) were within acceptable clinical limits, as were equivalence test results.TEB is equivalent to TD-derived cardiac index in postoperative cardiac surgery patients.
- Virginia Commonwealth University United States
- Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center United States
Postoperative Care, Cardiopulmonary Bypass, Thermodilution, Cardiography, Impedance, Intensive Care Units, Humans, Postoperative Period, Prospective Studies, Cardiac Output, Cardiac Surgical Procedures, Monitoring, Physiologic
Postoperative Care, Cardiopulmonary Bypass, Thermodilution, Cardiography, Impedance, Intensive Care Units, Humans, Postoperative Period, Prospective Studies, Cardiac Output, Cardiac Surgical Procedures, Monitoring, Physiologic
selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources.This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).129 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 1% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 1%
Citations provided by BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!