Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Seminars in Thoracic...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Article . 2017 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Pavia Experience in Reoperative Pulmonary Endarterectomy

Authors: MERLI, VERA NADIA; VISTARINI, NICOLA LUIGI CARLO; GRAZIOLI, VALENTINA; SCIORTINO, ANTONIO; PIN, MAURIZIO; PARISI, ILARIA; D'ARMINI, ANDREA MARIA;

Pavia Experience in Reoperative Pulmonary Endarterectomy

Abstract

In our experience, we reperformed pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) in 10 patients who previously underwent a first PEA. We analyzed this cohort of patients to investigate the main causes of recurrence of symptomatic pathology and the clinical and hemodynamic results of redo surgery. Between 1994 and April 2016, 10 of 716 patients were reoperated at our institution. Available postoperative data were analyzed, and a comparison between first and second PEA hemodynamic and clinical results was carried out. In-hospital mortality rate was also evaluated. After reoperation, mean pulmonary arterial pressure decreased from 45?±?9 to 34?±?10?mm Hg, and pulmonary vascular resistance reduced from 932?±?346?dyne*s*cm?5 to 428?±?207?dyne*s*cm?5. Hemodynamic data revealed worthy results of redo PEA, although they are less important than after first PEA. The World Health Organization (WHO) functional class improvement demonstrated satisfactory clinical results. In-hospital mortality of repeat PEA is 40%. Reoperative PEA operative candidacy should be assessed in case of young patients, no other risk factor, and recent medical history of pulmonary hypertension. In the other cases, in-hospital mortality rate is very high and pulmonary hypertension-specific drug therapy or interventional approach should be previously considered.

Country
Italy
Related Organizations
Keywords

Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Adult, Male, Reoperation, Time Factors, Adolescent, Hypertension, Pulmonary, Clinical Decision-Making, Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension, 610, Endarterectomy, Pulmonary Artery, Risk Factors, Humans, Arterial Pressure, Hospital Mortality, Aged, Retrospective Studies, Hemodynamics, Middle Aged, Reoperative pulmonary endarterectomy, Italy, Pulmonary endarterectomy, Surgery, Female, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Pulmonary Embolism

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    10
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
10
Top 10%
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!