
Although currently available data are variable, it appears that the incidence of surgical necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) has not decreased significantly over the past decade. Pneumoperitoneum and clinical deterioration despite maximal medical therapy remain the most common indications for operative treatment. Robust studies linking outcomes with specific indications for operation are lacking. Promising biomarkers for severe NEC include fecal calprotectin and S100A12; serum fatty acid-binding protein; and urine biomarkers. Recent advances in ultrasonography make this imaging modality more useful in identifying surgical NEC and near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) is being actively studied. Another fairly recent finding is that regionalization of care for infants with NEC likely improves outcomes. The neurodevelopmental outcomes after surgical treatment are known to be poor. A randomized trial near completion will provide robust data regarding neurodevelopmental outcomes after laparotomy versus drainage as the initial operative treatment for severe NEC.
Laparotomy, Patient Selection, S100A12 Protein, Enterostomy, Infant, Newborn, Infant, Premature, Diseases, Fatty Acid-Binding Proteins, Feces, Treatment Outcome, Enterocolitis, Necrotizing, Predictive Value of Tests, Infant, Extremely Premature, Drainage, Humans, Infant, Very Low Birth Weight, Leukocyte L1 Antigen Complex, Biomarkers
Laparotomy, Patient Selection, S100A12 Protein, Enterostomy, Infant, Newborn, Infant, Premature, Diseases, Fatty Acid-Binding Proteins, Feces, Treatment Outcome, Enterocolitis, Necrotizing, Predictive Value of Tests, Infant, Extremely Premature, Drainage, Humans, Infant, Very Low Birth Weight, Leukocyte L1 Antigen Complex, Biomarkers
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 147 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
