
pmid: 15493003
Diagnostic imaging has played a major role in the evaluation of patients with cancers of the bone and soft tissue. The imaging modalities have included radiography, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and bone scintigraphy. Current experience suggests that functional imaging with positron emission tomography (PET) and [F-18]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) may also have an important role in the imaging evaluation of patients with bone and soft tissue sarcoma, including guiding biopsy, detecting local recurrence in amputation stumps, detecting metastatic disease, predicting and monitoring response to therapy, and assessing for prognosis. Prospective studies with large patient groups will be essential to define the exact diagnostic role of FDG PET in this clinical setting, which should also include an evaluation of the cost-effectiveness and the short-term and long-term benefits in clinical decision making and management. In this article, we review the diagnostic utility of dedicated PET and PET combined with computed tomography imaging system in the evaluation of patients with bone and soft tissue malignancies.
Clinical Trials as Topic, Bone Neoplasms, Soft Tissue Neoplasms, Prognosis, Fluorodeoxyglucose F18, Positron-Emission Tomography, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Humans, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Radiopharmaceuticals, Neoplasm Staging
Clinical Trials as Topic, Bone Neoplasms, Soft Tissue Neoplasms, Prognosis, Fluorodeoxyglucose F18, Positron-Emission Tomography, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Humans, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Radiopharmaceuticals, Neoplasm Staging
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 38 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
