Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ EP Europacearrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
EP Europace
Article
Data sources: UnpayWall
EP Europace
Article . 1999 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
EP Europace
Article . 2001
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Head-up tilt testing potentiated with oral nitroglycerin; a randomized trial of the contribution of a drug-free phase and a nitroglycerin phase in the diagnosis of neurally mediated syncope

Authors: A. Del Rosso; Michele Brignole; Nicola Bottoni; Roberto Mureddu; Giovanni Foglia-Manzillo; Germano Gaggioli; Angelo Bartoletti; +3 Authors

Head-up tilt testing potentiated with oral nitroglycerin; a randomized trial of the contribution of a drug-free phase and a nitroglycerin phase in the diagnosis of neurally mediated syncope

Abstract

Since the pharmacological challenge with nitroglycerin (NTG) follows the initial drug-free phase in current tilt testing protocols, the effects of nitroglycerin alone and the appropriate duration of the basal phase are unknown.To optimize the test, a randomized intra-patient comparison of two protocols was undertaken: a conventional nitroglycerin test (cHUT) consisting of passive upright posture at 60 degrees for 45 min followed, if negative, by sublingual NTG 0.4 mg spray, with the test continued for 20 min; and, accelerated nitroglycerin test (aHUT) consisting of passive upright posture at 60 degrees for 5 min--to rule out orthostatic hypotension--followed by sublingual NTG 0.4 mg spray, with the test continued for 20 min. Eighty-four consecutive patients (33 males; mean age 55+/-22) with unexplained syncope underwent both cHUT and aHUT in a randomized sequence with a 24-72 h interval between them. Additionally, 25 age-matched control subjects underwent aHUT.In the drug-free phase, cHUT was positive in 15/84 patients (18%) and aHUT in 1/84 patients (1%). After NTG, cHUT and aHUT showed the same positivity rate of 33% (28/84 patients). The overall positivity rate was therefore higher with cHUT than with aHUT (51% vs 35%, P=0.04). Times to syncope were 29+/-12 min, (range 2-44) for cHUT drug-free phase, 5+/-2 min (range 2-9) for cHUT NTG phase, and 5+/-2 min (range 2-9) for aHUT. Only one (4%) of the control subjects had a positive response to aHUT.The contribution of NTG to the diagnosis is independent of the presence of an unmedicated phase. The appropriate duration of the NTG phase is 10 min. aHUT has good specificity, but a positivity rate lower than cHUT; thus a drug-free phase is necessary to increase the sensitivity of the test.

Keywords

Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Adolescent, Administration, Oral, Middle Aged, Nitroglycerin, Tilt-Table Test, Syncope, Vasovagal, Humans, Female, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    50
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
50
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
bronze