Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Clinical Oncologyarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Clinical Oncology
Article . 2001 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
Clinical Oncology
Article . 2001 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
Clinical Oncology
Other literature type . 2001
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

User Involvement in Cancer Services

Authors: J, Tritter; V, Barley;

User Involvement in Cancer Services

Abstract

User involvement has been a key part of government policy for a decade, but to what extent are users involved? From the Patient’s Charter [1] to NHS complaints systems, user involvement has been stressed as important. Yet the term ‘user involvement’ is itself not uncontested. For some it is the extent to which patients play an active role in decisions made about their care and treatment. For others the term refers to the inclusion of broader public ‘user’ input into planning decisions about the organization and delivery of NHS services. Even the most recent Department of Health publication refers to these two aspects as ‘a commitment to give people at a local level the power to make decisions about the range of services that are needed ..... This means giving patients more information, and encouraging healthcare professionals to treat patients as equal partners in the decision making process’ [2]. A key aspect of promoting this shift towards greater involvement, of both types, in the NHS has been through the Health in Partnership Policy Research Programme. This £2.5 million programme is ‘designed to inform understanding of the effect of user involvement in the NHS’ [3]. This Editorial presents an outline of current innovative research funded under this initiative that seeks to develop and evaluate existing approaches to involving users in cancer services. A 3-year project, ‘Developing and evaluating best practice for user involvement in cancer services’, was initiated in October 1999, based at Avon, Somerset and Wiltshire Cancer Services. (The research is directed by a project steering group, which includes N. Daykin (University of the West of England), J. McNeill (Cancerlink), S. Mitchard (Avon, Somerset and Wiltshire Cancer Services (ASWCS)), R. Newport (University of the West of England), J. Rimmer (ASWCS) and P. Turton (Bristol Cancer Help Centre), as well as the authors.) The project involves clinicians in the multidisciplinary teams, academics from the University of Warwick and the University of the West of England, Cancerlink and the Bristol Cancer Help Centre. We are investigating current

Related Organizations
Keywords

Information Services, National Health Programs, Quality Assurance, Health Care, Community Participation, Public Policy, Medical Oncology, United Kingdom, Patient Satisfaction, Neoplasms, Humans, Delivery of Health Care

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    2
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
2
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!