
pmid: 11441388
To compare muscle activation deficits and muscle physiology in older versus younger adults.A maximal volitional isometric contraction of the quadriceps muscle with burst-superimposition was used to assess strength and activation. In addition, force-frequency testing during fresh, fatigue, and recovery conditions and electrically elicited fatigue testing were performed.Muscle performance laboratory.Healthy, active young (age range, 20-28 yr) and older (age range, 66-83 yr) subjects.Torque production, activation of the quadriceps, F50 values from the force-frequency relationships (frequency at which 50% of the maximum normalized force is produced), and the average amount of fatigue.Older subjects were weaker (574.4 +/- 156 N) than younger subjects (900.9 +/- 295 N) and had significantly greater deficits in central activation in the quadriceps muscles (elderly = 95.5% activation; younger = 98.1% activation). The force-frequency curves for the elderly were to the left of the younger subjects for all 3 testing conditions. Aged muscles fatigued to the same extent as younger muscle (young = 49.8% +/- 2.6%, elderly = 51.1% +/- 2.8%).These results can be used to modify high-intensity strength training protocols designed to optimize sustainable strength gains in the elderly during rehabilitation.
Adult, Male, Leg, Age Factors, Electric Stimulation, Torque, Isometric Contraction, Muscle Fatigue, Humans, Female, Muscle, Skeletal, Aged
Adult, Male, Leg, Age Factors, Electric Stimulation, Torque, Isometric Contraction, Muscle Fatigue, Humans, Female, Muscle, Skeletal, Aged
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 63 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
