
doi: 10.1049/sbra034e_ch4
Target detection is a probabilistic idea; noise and clutter prevent us from being certain to find the targets we are looking for, and will normally present us with plenty of 'targets' we are not looking for. We can only define the probabilities of detection and of false alarm that we are prepared to live with. These determine the signal-to-noise ratio that is required for detection. Optimal detection performance is achieved by maximizing the SNR at the output of the receiver. The receiver that does this uses the correlation or matched filter principle. As long as a matched filter is being used, the form of the transmitted pulse is irrelevant for detection purposes. All that matters is the ratio of the signal energy to the noise power per unit bandwidth on input to the receiver. By developing expressions for the PDFs of signal plus noise and noise only, relatively straightforward calculations of detection and false-alarm probabilities can be carried out for single pulses. These become more complicated when fluctuating targets and multiple pulses need to be considered, so that graphical or numerical techniques are needed.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
