
doi: 10.1049/pbcs057e_ch6
handle: 11572/346703
In this chapter, we have covered some of the general challenges in the physical stress of electronic devices. The benefits of using particles beams to evaluate the reliability of devices are various, such as a realistic error rate and a realistic error model. Additionally, thanks to the accelerated beam, a statistically significant amount of data can be gathered in a relatively short time (hours). However, the preparation of the setup is very challenging and, while there are some general guidelines, each facility has its own constraints. When performing beam experiments, it is fundamental to carefully design the setup. As beam experiments do not allow visibility as fault injection, it is necessary to ensure the test of all components and to test proper benchmarks. Finally, the correlation between beam experiments data and fault injection is still an open question.
Accelerated beam; Electronic devices; Ergonomics; Fault injection; Particles beams; Physical stress; Realistic error rate
Accelerated beam; Electronic devices; Ergonomics; Fault injection; Particles beams; Physical stress; Realistic error rate
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
