
In overlay‐based applications, multiple overlay networks are deployed to fulfill different service requirements. A multi‐overlay environment may exist in which a number of nodes simultaneously participate in the networks. When there are multiple overlay‐based applications running over a set of nodes, some of the nodes take extra effort to maintain multi‐overlay networks. Therefore, maintaining these co‐existing overlays incurs redundant maintenance overhead. This research presents a cooperative strategy for exploiting a master–slave model to handle the common overlay‐maintenance. The purpose is to eliminate the redundant maintenance overhead. To evaluate system performance, this study not only analyses various combinations of multiple overlays but also considers the effectiveness of the master selection approach. Experimental results demonstrated that the proposed cooperative strategy significantly decreases the redundant overlay‐maintenance overhead. In some cases, the overall reduction ratio of maintaining multiple overlays is as high as 60%.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
